Political parties withdraw from National Dialogue

HARARE - President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s multi-party initiative for a national dialogue could soon reach a dead-end after three political parties withdrew citing lack of credibility among other reasons.

Sources who were present during the closed door meetings said some of the political parties were beginning voice concerns over the direction the talks were taking.

United Democratic Alliance (UDA)’s Daniel Shumba wrote on his Twitter handle soon after the meeting saying he had formally withdrawn from the National Dialogue process which he described as  “insincere, choreographed, and highly compromised, with some political principals singing for their supper.”

 “We disagree with the process, purpose, issues and level of engagement. Clearly, no outcomes can be expected from this facade.

 “The process starts with a predetermined agenda even before agreeing on the moderator, issues, or milestones. 

“It’s inconsequential and of no effect,” he said.

While many had hoped for a national dialogue facilitated by the National Peace and Reconciliation Commission (NPRC), the organisation’s chairperson Selo Nare told this publication that the OPC was handling the dialogue.

With regards to the facilitator, Shumba added: “It (meeting) was presided over by a Nare (Selo Nare), who is clearly out of his depth, and following a Zanu PF script. They refuse to broaden the participation to include other stakeholders,” he added.

Some political parties who snubbed the meeting echoed Shumba’s sentiments questioning Mnangagwa’s model of dialogue which “fails the credibility test”. 

In a letter addressed to Chief Secretary to the President and Cabinet (OPC) Misheck Sibanda, Build Zimbabwe Alliance leader Noah Manyika said: “No meaningful dialogue can happen without neutral and credible convener being agreed on to facilitate a broad and inclusive dialogue that will include trade unionists, political parties, civic groups and all stakeholders to ensure that the views and interests are represented.”

He added: “It is in my view that a dialogue without MDC Alliance and any other critical stakeholders ... the (dialogue) will not pass credibility tests locally and globally and it is our collective  responsibility and specifically that of our convener that would emerge from this process to ensure that everyone who needs to be at the table is included.”

While this could have been a significant development which could signal the beginning of fresh dialogue to normalise politics in Zimbabwe, another political party also slammed the door to dialogue.

People’s Progressive Party of Zimbabwe leader Timothy Chiguvare also wrote: “We regret to inform you that we will not be taking part in the national dialogue due to the position we have taken as a party and intend to make our position public very soon.”

    Comments (4)

    United Democratic Alliance??? It's an irrelevant entity. And who's Daniel Shumba?

    Buns Tinobvinex - 24 February 2019

    The real dialogue is between Chamisa and ED. Daniel Shumba is brilliant on his move to quite such a nonsensical dialogue. All these other failed presidential candidates do not have voices behind them. Why do they want to waste our time. ED must not play these jokes. If he is genuine on dialogue he must dialogue with Chamisa.

    Amalinze - 24 February 2019

    Chamisa thinks kuti if he takes his sweet time to dialogue, then his supporters become better off economically - hahahaha!!

    Nyandoro - 25 February 2019

    Chamisa and Biti have nothing to put on the table financially. We need guys with Ph.Ds to run the economy, not looters and anarchists like Kamisa naBiti. I remember last year in Chipinge when Chamisa told a rally that all hospitals will be turned into hotels and the money will come from NSSA. I immediately concluded that workers pensions are at risk and Chamisa will be another Robert Maxwell.

    Ndiani Ndiani - 26 February 2019

    Post a comment

    Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
    Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
    - Editor

    Your email address will not be shared.