Chivayo wins $25m ZPC case, court says Intratrek contract valid

HARARE - Intratrek Zimbabwe has won a $25 million lawsuit against the Zimbabwe Power Company (ZPC) and in which High Court judge Tawanda Chitapi has also ruled that the contract between the Zesa subsidiary, and Wicknell Chivayo's firm was still valid, and binding.

This comes as the flamboyant businessman has been charged with “criminal conduct” in the manner in which he won the 100 megawatt (MW) Gwanda solar tender, which the applicant’s lawyers said were designed to frustrate his client.

“It be and is hereby declared that procurement contract No ZPC 304/2015 dated October 23 2015 between the applicant and respondent is valid, and binding between the parties,” Chitapi said, adding the energy firm “acted unlawfully and in bad faith” - and possibly under external influence - especially when the contract provided for a dispute resolution mechanism in a matter which did not warrant any criminal sanction.

“The parties shall meet to review progress in regard to the discharge of their obligations in terms thereof as provided for in clause 5 of the contract within 60 days of this order failing, which the party in default shall be deemed to have repudiated the contract and liable in damages to and at the instance of the innocent party,” he said.

According to Intratrek, the claim was broken down as $15 million for loss of profit from the purported termination of the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract $5 million for costs in putting together the CHINT Electric partnership and China Exim Bank financing as well as $5 million for reputational damage.

Chitapi emphasized that Zimbabwean law provided for competent remedies and the ZPC’s “attempts to hold the EPC contract as either lapsed or terminated was incompetent, and the company could not terminate an agreement, which had not commenced”.

He also said the involvement of state organs in the form of police in a situation where there was a clear dispute resolution mechanism of arbitration was “unfortunate and precipitate”, and such conduct “would send wrong signals to investors that if they conclude contracts with state entities they risk criminal charges”.

Crucially, Chitapi said section 49 (2) of the constitution guarantees that “no person may be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfill a contractual obligation and the sanctity of contracts enjoys constitutional protection”.

With the judge stressing that the contract between the two parties was still legitimate and there was need for them to review the progress of the project in order to meet the contract’s demands, Chivayo’s lawyer also said their focus was not for relief, but implementation of the project.

“My client seeks to have the contract and he will implement their contract. One of the grounds upon which relief was sought here was that the criminal proceedings in the magistrate’s court were part of an elaborate plan to undermine the contract and to ensure that there was no performance,” Uriri said.

”The contract provides that the parties should meet and review the project towards satisfaction of the conditions. With the current government’s thrust that there be accelerated development to ensure the attainment of a middle-income status for the country by 2030, it is hoped that key projects like the one involved in this case are not stalled by unnecessary bickering and extra contractual frustrations,” Chitapi added.

Chivayo had dragged the ZPC to court for raising malicious charges of fraud against Intratek and allegedly frustrating his company, and hindering it from fulfilling its obligations.

“As patriotic Zimbabweans, we have no intentions of benefiting from any damages. Our focus remains to implement the project... and feed 100 MW of clean energy into the national grid for the benefit of the nation..,” the youthful entrepreneur said Wednesday.

“...I would like to also take this opportunity to sincerely apologise... and assure the assure nation that the project will be commissioned soon,” Chivayo said.


Sign up to receive DAILY NEWS mobile phone text alerts from 5 cents a day. Dial *109*2# now to register. This service available to Econet users only.

Comments (5)

All these corruption cases will never have even one culprit behind bars.Why i say so is because most of these shady deals involves those at the top from the president.So for the mafia leaders to act as if they are serious,they mat let those small fish get arrested and orders the judges presiding over the cases to rule in favour of the accused.Believe me,if this idiotic govt was really serious about corruption,by now there could have been a sizeable number of corruption convicts.ED is the godfather of corruption,so to the only way he will deal with it is to say a lot of anti corruption messages in the media and rallies and it end there.Expecting him to go beyond is a snowball's chance in hell.Remember he was the minister of defence when he used Zim soldiers in DRC to protect the blood diamonds that he siphoned from the war torn country.A lot of young soldiers died defending his diamond loot and surley people expect him to deal with corruption decisively.Corruption not Dambudzo should be his second name.Kunewo mazungairwa anotoita hupenyu hwose vachingo bealiviswa asi chabuda hapana.Suffer continues.

janana wa Bikaz madhogodhogo - 14 December 2018

Famba bla-Chivhayo famba

shaolin kung fu master - 14 December 2018

Zimbabwe has become one humongous SEPTIC TANK and the large chunks have risen to the top. Cry the Beloved country

Daniel 5 - 14 December 2018

with Ed as President zimbabwe is heading for total collapse .sometimes i think zim is really cursed for sure.how can we have such a corrupt ruthless and direction less man as our leader

rati - 15 December 2018

crooks boasting about having lunch in Dubai. Using taxpayers money

Ndiani Ndiani - 15 December 2018

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.