Zanu PF steals MDC data?

HARARE - The legal team representing the MDC Alliance is accusing President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administration of breaking into their attorney’s offices and stealing large amounts of data from their computer, days before the opposition alliance filed a petition challenging the results of the presidential election.

The allegation, based on documents prepared by Mnangagwa’s lead advocate Lewis Uriri on August 8, two days before Chamisa asked the Constitutional Court (Con-Court) to invalidate the presidential election results, suggests a wide-ranging conspiracy involving sophisticated hacking and theft of documents.

This has further raised the stakes in the Con-Court petition in which Nelson Chamisa of the MDC Alliance is challenging the results of the July 30 presidential election.

Mnangagwa’s legal team denies it stole any documents, and branded the accusation “nonsensical.”

In a legal opinion rendered to his client, advocate Uriri agrees with the MDC Alliance that the last day of filing of the presidential petition was midnight August 10.

And after the court challenge has been filed, the inauguration cannot go ahead.

Uriri then suggests he has discussed with Mnangagwa the prospects of success of the MDC Alliance’s petition, and states he already had “draft responses to hand”.

This was two days before the opposition had filed its papers.

“I must mention in passing that I have previously advised on, and we have discussed, the prospects of success of any potential petition on every possible conceivable
ground and concluded that on the facts and the law any such petition suffers from imminent and predictable failure.

“Our draft responses are at) hand and will be finalised as soon as the petition is served and filed within the time lines provided for in the rules of court,” Uriri said.

Chamisa’s chief election agent, Jameson Timba, told the Daily News yesterday that they were greatly disturbed as to how Zanu PF lawyers “could have been ready with both factual and legal responses to our petition two days before it was filed as indicated in the opinion allegedly coming from Advocate Uriri.”

“If indeed this opinion is bona fide, two points are worth noting. Firstly, contrary to what has been peddled in the public media, our petition was filed on time that is before midnight on Friday 10th August 2018,” Timba said.

Timba alleged Zanu PF broke into their lawyers’ offices and illegally accessed the petition.

“Secondly, as stated in the opinion circulated on social media, Zanu PF could have only accessed our draft petition by hacking the computers of our lawyers. You cannot rig an election and also try to rig a court process,” Timba fumed to the Daily News. “We urge Zanu PF and its lawyers to respect court processes and desist from shenanigans that continue to show the whole world that a leopard can never change its spots.”

Uriri told the Daily News yesterday that the MDC Alliance was making “nonsensical” accusations.

“Paragraph 31 says that we have got draft responses to hand. That is nonsensical because you read the whole of the paragraph it says that we have looked at every possible conceivable argument that they may have and we have considered our draft responses to that.

“So you are basically saying in a game of chess, what else is this guy going to play and how do I counter that move. You have five, six moves planned ahead, so you put your things in writing,” Uriri said.

The Temple Bar attorney said the MDC Alliance allegation betrayed “desperation by people that have absolutely no clue what they are doing or should be doing.”

He took great exception to the break-in allegations.

“We are law-abiding people and we are of course entitled to having our own perceptions about what points are being taken or are going to be taken and how they are going to be taken and prepare for them,” he said.

In his opinion and advice to Mnangagwa, Uriri said: “It is for the above reasons that I conclude and advise that: The dies induciae (time granted to a party to appear in answer to a summons or citation) for the filing of any challenge to my consultant’s election as the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe lapses at mid-night on the 10th August 2018.

“Inauguration day where no petition is filed by midnight on the 10th of August 2018 is the 12th August 2018. A petition challenging my consultant’s election as President of the Republic of Zimbabwe has the effect of delaying his inauguration up until the 25th August 2018. He must in any event be sworn in no later than the 26th August 2018.”

Timba slammed Uriri’s suggestion that the MDC Alliance’s petition “suffers from imminent and predictable failure.”

“How can Uriri allegedly say with certainty that our petition would fail before it has been filed and heard?  Does he know something that we all don’t know?” Timba asked rhetorically.

“Our case is strong and our cause is just and we remain hopeful that justice will be served and the will of the people will prevail.”

Comments (4)

hande CHamy hande iwe ndichiendakupi kustate house baba

g40 - 15 August 2018

This is kind of stuff that is designed to unnecessarily stock tempers. I dont think Timba is that daft not to realise that any attorney worth his salt would run different hypothetical scenarios in order to adequately prepare for a trial. What is he is trying to stock tampers and discredit the court process before it even finishes. These tactics may get you what you want but ultimately are unheathly for the development of the nation. It seems the strategy has been that if ZanuPF wins, every effort must be made to tarnish that victory so that they eventually come to the negotiating table. Not sure its the best way to build a nation. I didnt vote ZanuPF by the way! Lest someone starts branding me.

The Beautiful ones are not yet born - 16 August 2018

If Mr Timba really said what he is reported to have said, then it is very unfortunate! I regards Mr Timba as a mature, educated and sensible man, but if he takes politicking to this low level, then I wonder what the MDC Alliance is really up to!

Mhofu Chaiyo - 16 August 2018

Surely, for a spokesman of the opposition to even suggest that their lawyer's computers were hacked is, in my opinion, far fetched. It reminds me of someone already preparing a defence in case something goes wrong with their petition. That's the danger of social media. Statements are peddled to sway the public opinion. We want facts here not premature inferences/conclusions. Let the courts do their job.

kane moyo - 16 August 2018

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.