Presidential election results contain disturbing arithmetic errors: ERC

 

HARARE - The results announced by the electoral commission reflect ill-preparedness and gross inaccuracies, the Election Resource Centre (ERC) has said.

President Emmerson Mnangagwa received 50,8 percent of the vote while main opposition challenger Nelson Chamisa received 44,3 percent.

The ERC said there was potential manipulation or fraud.

“The results announced expose disturbing arithmetic errors, over voting (more votes than registered voters), results counted more than once, missing polling stations, polling stations without results and polling station identity numbers that are different from the gazetted ones,” ERC said in a press statement issued yesterday.

“The existence of such inadequacies on the announced presidential results, coupled with the absence of a publicly shared complete biometric voters’ roll used on polling day exposes the elections, including the results, to potential manipulation or fraud.”

ERC said in an environment of limited public confidence in the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec), the elections body could have done a better job in fully and pro-actively preparing for the 2018 harmonised elections including verifying their own information, availing opportunities and necessary information for independent verification of all electoral processes.

“Further, Zec should have been more accountable to election stakeholders across the election cycle,” ERC said.

“Going forward, Zec must improve on issues around accuracy and transparency in election administration.”

Ahead of the 2018 elections, in its pre-election report, the ERC raised concerns around what appeared to be clear indications of ill-preparedness by Zec to conduct a credible, free and fair election.

“Major signals of Zec’s ill-preparedness to run a credible poll included limited transparency in the administration of key electoral processes such as voter registration, procurement, production, storage and distribution of sensitive electoral materials including ballot papers,” the group said.

“The pattern of ill-preparedness was also clearly evident in the state of the availed incomplete voters’ roll.

“The voters’ roll contained inaccuracies that should not have been accommodated in a biometric voters’ roll such as potential duplicate entries, entries with missing information such as residential addresses and questionable identity numbers.

“While some of the challenges with the incomplete voters’ roll shared could have been a result of a potentially defective civil register, the ERC contended that a credible voters’ roll should have rejected inaccurate entries and the fact that such entries had been left on the roll raise questions around Zec’s competence.” 

Unfortunately, the same issues regarding ill-preparedness and gross inaccuracies have arisen with the results announced by the electoral commission.

Zec chairperson Priscilla Chigumba has said: “We are absolutely confident there was no rigging… we at the Zimbabwean Electoral Commission will not steal (the people’s) choice of leaders, we will not subvert their will.”

Comments (3)

Who is the 'Electoral Resource Centre'? Who pays their bills?

Buns Tinobvina - 11 August 2018

@Buns Good question. Without that information we run into the risk of double counting.

willo - 12 August 2018

Zes thought they had a fall-back plan and lost the plot big time. If the rumors are true of Russian experts roped in to rig the outcome of our elections in favor of the current regime, then I suggest a refund is in order. A shoddy job was done, because no matter which side the coin falls, our President has been compromised and badly exposed, through no fault of his own.. Zec must resign en masse...

C. Kandez - 13 August 2018

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.