Chamisa alleges foul play

HARARE - Tuesday's shock ruling by the Bulawayo High Court left the MDC party crying foul as it played straight into Zanu PF’s hands, which analysts said was the biggest beneficiary of the confusion in the MDC party.

Respected University of Zimbabwe political science lecturer, Eldred Masunungure, told the Daily News yesterday that Nelson Chamisa’s MDC party had been dealt a body blow by the ruling, adding that Zanu PF would capitalise on the confusion in the country’s largest opposition party.

Masunungure said the squabbling between Chamisa and Thokozani Khupe — who is also claiming the party’s leadership — over the party’s symbols will confuse the electorate at the forthcoming polls, suggesting the only way for the barrister to end the charade would be to rebrand the MDC.

“It will confuse the electorate, whether it’s Chamisa or Khupe, but a big blow for Chamisa who has most to lose if the matter goes beyond election day,” opined Masunungure.

“Khupe may benefit from that confusion because she does not have the numbers and the situation may also benefit Zanu PF. It is in the best interest of Chamisa to find a solution because these matters might drag on for months, especially if it is in the interest of the ruling party.”

Masunungure opined yesterday that if Chamisa wants to end the confusion perpetuated by Tuesday’s court ruling, he should consider rebranding the party, formed in 1999.

He said it would not be the first time this has happened, citing two examples.

In 1980, he said, former president Robert Mugabe rebranded the revolutionary party to Zanu PF after falling out with Ndabaningi Sithole in the penultimate stages of the guerrilla war.

In 2006, the MDC was also rebranded after its founding father Morgan Tsvangirai lost a legal battle despite having won hearts and minds in the court of public opinion.

“Chamisa may want to consider rebranding the party because he is the one with most to lose,” said Masunungure.

On Tuesday, Chamisa lost an urgent chamber application filed by his party this month in which the MDC had sought to ban their erstwhile former deputy president from using the party’s symbols.

Bulawayo High Court judge Justice Francis Bere ruled that the matter was not urgent, and that the dispute was better resolved through arbitration.

In the aftermath of Tsvangirai’s death on February 14, Khupe, Chamisa and MDC vice president Elias Mudzuri had all claimed the party’s presidency.

Before Tsvangirai’s body could be flown home for burial from South Africa where the maverick opposition leader had lost the battle against colon cancer, the MDC National Council hastily convened a meeting where Chamisa was elected interim leader.

In days that followed, he was elected substantive MDC president.

Thereafter, attempts were made to narrow differences between Chamisa and Khupe, with the latter remaining adamant that she was the legitimate MDC leader.

Peeved by her intransigence, a decision was made to dismiss Khupe and her allies from the MDC, followed by their recall from Parliament.

Khupe is contesting her recall from the National Assembly and attempts by Chamisa to cut her loose from the MDC.

In the wake of Bere’s ruling, there is a possibility that ballot papers could have names of the two MDC formations, which could have grievous consequences for the opposition.

Political analyst Pedzisai Ruhanya said the MDC should have understood that taking political conflicts to the courts was tantamount to referring them to the Zanu PF politburo to make a decision.

Ruhanya said the dispute over MDC control was a political rather than a legal matter and the courts of public opinion should make a decision not the High Court.

“…remember after the coup, it is the same High Court that said the coup was constitutional, such a court cannot be trusted, even in burial societies they don’t accept coups,” he said.

Ruhanya said the ruling was hollow as it will change nothing.

“It will change nothing, the High Court said nothing interesting, there is nothing substantive apart from seducing shareholders of this confusion and the suggestion is that Zanu PF is a shareholder in the MDC fights.

“But one important thing that the MDC should understand is that in competitive authoritarian regimes like Zimbabwe the Judiciary, the media, the Legislature and the electoral field are serious areas of political contestation and manipulation so the MDC must take the Judiciary in an authoritarian state not as an arena for the rule of law but a key area of manipulation so that the interests of the incumbent are safeguarded,” said Ruhanya.

Yesterday, Chamisa’s party threw tantrums at the ruling party, claiming there was a ploy involving arms of the State to freeze the party’s bank accounts and impound its vehicles in order to ensure a Zanu PF victory.

Soon after the High Court ruling, MDC treasurer-general Charlton Hwende tweeted that the judgment was politically-motivated and meant to negatively influence the party’s performance in the forthcoming elections.

Hwende revealed in the tweet that an accountant from the Justice ministry was fired last week for releasing the party’s share of a government grant they were entitled to in terms of the Political Parties Finance Act and that they were attempts to freeze the MDC’s account with one of the country’s top commercial banks.

“Yesterday’s court ruling is part of a plan by the State to destroy the MDC. Last week, an accountant from (the) Justice ministry who released our share of the government grant to our account was fired. They tried to freeze our CBZ account and failed,” he said.

“They have now resorted to funding Khupe and her group to destabilise our party. They are claiming our name, they will claim our vision, they will claim our icon Dr Morgan Tsvangirai and they will even claim our president Nelson Chamisa but they will never succeed because our supporters will vote them out in July. Let’s remain resolute — let them claim the name, logos or our colours but your vote is the ultimate decider,” added Hwende.

Luke Tamborinyoka, Chamisa’s spokesperson, echoed Hwende’s sentiments yesterday, describing Bere’s ruling as “politically motivated”.

He said: “Khupe and her cabal remain expelled from the party; we believe this is a political judgment; it’s contestable and appealable, but the court of public opinion is very clear. There is an outpouring of support for the MDC led by Nelson Chamisa”.

The MDC has also raised concern over the presence of soldiers in villagers — with Chamisa last week pleading with the military top brass to pull back the uniformed forces into the barracks.

The newly-elected MDC Khupe vice president Obert Gutu said as far as they were concerned, they have moved on and will win any legal battle.

“Legally, we have always been in an extremely good space. Without bragging, the fact of the matter is that we have assembled some of Zimbabwe’s finest legal minds and these are the people who are advising us. We are not taking any prisoners. Indeed, we are on a roll. Every step that we take is carefully and meticulously planned and executed. Politically as well, we are a huge force to reckon with. We are poised to shock the nation by winning the elections. Just watch the space,” said Gutu.

At its congress — where Khupe was elected the substantive president of the MDC — the party decided to remove Tsvangirai’s face from the open palm and replaced it with a picture of a child.

Comments (10)

Is it true that MDC T removed Tsvangirayi's picture on their logo and replaced it with RGM's grandchild Simbanashe Chikoore? So Robert Mugabe is now running the MDC T. God f

Joseph Mutasa - 26 April 2018

Ruhanya,Hwende & Tamborinyoka are clearly mere reactionaries;Khupe is clearly complaining of party constitution breaches which they must only prove in the public eye that their actions of late were precisely to the letter of their constitution, full stop. Chamisa has of late emerged a liar & a manipulator of high magnitude our country has ever had;lying at rallies that would buy bullet trains for us,when our country has not yet reached n stage to fancy such luxury-wanting only to revamp its industrial base to employ its people,only build its dilapidated roads,fight to stabilize its economic fundamentals etc & Chamisa sort to manipulate his gullible crowds into a bunch of fools only intent to b catapulted to Zimbabwe House-proffering no sensible solutions at all.Biti appears to b one of the sensible men among them.Chamisa appeared to want to play on the emotions of people like some demagogue,dancing on the Sithole heroship in chipinge and Nkomo's in Bulawayo in order to woodwink or play people to send him to Zimbabwe house.Now his friends above are playing into the same basket of liars & reactionaries;when the renowned bulawayo judge has just passed a the fairest & clear position to the matter

addmore gudo - 26 April 2018

Surely rebranding is the way to go. We are going for elections as MDC Alliance. This spirit of alliance should go beyond elections whether we win or we lose the forthcoming elections. The two camps differed on the issue of the alliance so there is no fear for those who opted for the alliance in hope of getting a big share of votes if such unity prevails. Shame to mbimbindogas MDC-khupes, as we are not sure of their agenda. These are Zanu- pf clones. We hear their Language haisi yeChange but a Zanu-pf cause. I implore right minded alliance executives to rebrand but carrying on with Tsvangirai's Philosophy. The philosophy of alliance is of unity, inclusivity and togetherness as one suffering Zimbabweans. Vatengesi ava pasi navo. They want the opposition to fail through technically engineered politics. Ndomabasa eZanu-pf iwayo chaiwo. Saka mabrothers angu rebrand, mantain RED color. ChiAlliance ngachibude ipapa. Garwe ririkuswera kumaporofita nefear of Cyclone Chamisa.

Bwadam - 26 April 2018

The only way out for Nelson Chamisa MDC is to rebrand as MDC Alliance that way they may participate in the forthcoming elections.

Frank - 26 April 2018

@addmore gudo - agree with your analysis. Chamisa arikukwidza vapfana ava ndege yemashanga. And the opinions of these Ruhanyas, Masunungures, Ibbos, Magaisas, Mahosos et al, are equally confusing and misleading. Maporofita chaiwo!!

Will Blackman - 26 April 2018

As we prepare for the elections, what strategies have the Alliance put in place a 45 to 50 % rural Vote? I remain fully convinced that we need to find a way for the disenfranchised diasporans to seek a proxy vote to represent them. Can the MDC Election directorate take note. Get a brother or sister to engage their families back home. It is not too late to make the diaspora vote matter. A word to the wise must be enough.

Diaspora Proxy Vote Strategy - 26 April 2018

NO genuine MDC supporter will ever vote for Thokozanu.she betrayed Tsvangirayi when he was still alive .she is now zanu pf .she will be a nobody after election just wait and see

dumi - 26 April 2018

The judiaciary in Zimbabwe is the best in Africa.stupid mdc must not blame judiciary for its short comings

ty - 27 April 2018

they will see us machinja chaowo musi we vote.we have aready changed kudhara musi wataregister kuvoter we will bury poor kuphe zanu for ever others will draw lesson from her

don - 27 April 2018

MDC Chamisa faction is supposed to know the law better because its lead by a lawyer Advocate Chamisa but alas ! they seem not to have a clue of the law . One wonders what he would do if he would become President . All they know is crying foul . They lose elections and cry rigging . They lose court cases and cry political decision . Keep on doing your business of crying .

Hayibo. - 27 April 2018

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.