Govt's policy confusion continues

HARARE - The fatal policy inconsistencies of President Robert Mugabe’s ever-blundering government — which have left the Zimbabwean economy on its knees — have once again been cruelly exposed.

This comes after Industry and Commerce minister Mika Bimha said yesterday that the ban on the importation of basic consumer goods into the country would stay — hardly 48 hours after State media had been made to believe that the contentious embargo had been lifted.

The government introduced the controversial ban in June last year, after it invoked Statutory Instrument (SI) 64 — as it bid to curb ballooning imports, and to protect struggling local industries.

But Bimha told journalists yesterday that SI 64 was “here to stay” despite the earlier indications that it was being phased out.

“As of now, SI 64 remains in place and what we are doing is to buttress SI 64 by other measures, including the local content policy.

“The whole idea behind SI 64 was to allow industry to re-tool and re-equip, and we cannot possibly say this was achieved over one year.

“Apart from this, we would still need a report from the SI 64 evaluation and monitoring committee on the effectiveness of the instrument, before we can scrap it, and as you may be aware, this report is yet to be compiled,” Bimha said on the side-lines of an industrial tour in Harare.

“I have always told manufacturers not to relax, because the SI will not last forever. And we are not just going to implement a blanket approach to scraping it. We will apply this sector by sector, examining those who will have recorded successes and then lifting the protection.

“When SI 64 came into being, there were threats of retaliation from our trading partners. At that time there were threats from South Africa, our major trading partner, followed by Zambia.

“We were proactive and engaged them . . . demonstrating why we had come up with the measure and where Zimbabwe was going, and that was well received and the government of South Africa understood and even promised to give us the support to make sure we succeed.

“But they did mention that they were also facing pressure from their private sector for obvious reasons because they were now losing the revenue that they were used to . . . However, all these issues were resolved,” he added.

The government imposed a ban on the importation of a number of basic consumer goods last year, saying this was an endeavour to not only reduce imports in the wake of worsening cash shortages, but also to stimulate local industry.

But the decision backfired spectacularly when deadly riots paralysed operations at Beitbridge Border Post just weeks after this was introduced, with protesters burning a Zimra warehouse in the process.

Among the products whose importation was banned were coffee creamers, Camphor creams, white petroleum jellies, body creams, baked beans, potato crisps, cereals, bottled water, mayonnaise, salad cream, peanut butter, jam, maheu, canned fruits and vegetables, pizza bases, yoghurts, flavoured milk, dairy juice blends, ice-creams, cultured milk and cheese.

Zimbabwe is currently in the middle of a severe economic crisis which has seen local production plummeting to frightening levels due to low capacity utilisation and depressed investor confidence.

Comments (2)

Policy inconsistency has always been as synonymous with the bungling ZANU pf- led Government as it has been its conspicuous attribute and hence the economic mess we are in and these people have remained incorrigible in that regard.

Vusumuzi wako Mange - 24 May 2017

I am not seeing any policy inconsistence here. How can newspaper pronouncements/reports be regarded as Ministerial policy pronouncements, I am not getting it honestly.

Local Investor - 24 May 2017

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.