Zim, SA trade war looms over imports

HARARE - The government is headed for further collision not only with small traders and ordinary Zimbabweans, but also with its biggest trading partner, South Africa (SA).

This comes after Industry and Commerce minister Mike Bimha said yesterday that the government was considering widening the ban on imported basic commodities from outside Zimbabwe into the country.

Just a few days ago, Zimbabwean and SA officials met to try and resolve the controversial imports ban which has hurt SA companies and also sparked deadly riots at Beitbridge Border Post earlier this month.

But Bimha told the Daily News in an interview yesterday that the government was not only not going to review its current import restrictions, but was also mulling adding more goods to the list of banned items that cannot be imported into the country.

“If we are to change the policy, we might change by putting more products. FROM P1

“We cannot change a policy that supports our local industry. And I am sure our neighbours understand that,” he said on the side-lines of a meeting of the Consignment Based Conformity Assessment Programme.

“There are no agreements (with SA). We continue to discuss and share information, and in terms of SI 64 it was just for us to tell them why we did that and for them to understand. They understand because we also have our issues with them.

“So, we told them why we did it and we continue to do that. We also have trade issues with them. We have pharmaceuticals that go to SA and they inquire that they be air-lifted and that makes them cost more.

“We are still talking to them to say why should you make a restriction on our pharmaceuticals when your pharmaceuticals we allow them to come through the border. We have a lot of issues,” Bimha added.

The trade chief also said Zimbabwe had likewise briefed the Southern African Development Community (Sadc) on its intentions to boost the fortunes of local industry.

“Sadc has been very vocal in support of the removal of sanctions and when you have sanctions your banks cannot give money to industry and industry cannot grow. So, they are very much aware of the situation that we went through.

“We advised Sadc of SI 64 and why we are doing it and I said this is a temporary measure which is time-bound. We need to put more measures up to ensure that our manufacturing base is consolidated,” Bimha said.

On July 1, riots erupted in the border town of Beitbridge as traders protested the imports ban which they said had killed businesses and livelihoods.

SA is Zimbabwe’s biggest trading partner although its northern neighbour imports more from it than what it sells to its markets — with Pretoria contributing about 36 percent of Zimbabwe’s total imports during the first quarter of this year, according to Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) figures.

When Zimbabwe and SA governments met last week to look at the imports ban, Pretoria insisted that Zimbabwe was breaching regional trade protocols.

“Zimbabwe is in breach of Southern African Development Community protocols and the issue will be taken up at a technical level. We have already sent the list of items to Zimbabwe.

“It will also be raised at Cabinet as well as at bilateral forums,” SA’s director general (permanent secretary) for the Department of Trade and Industry, Lionel October, said during a briefing with SA media last week, adding ominously that: “We cannot accept the way our exporters are being treated”.

Comments (10)

South Africa is the reason this pitiful and incompetent and corrupt did not collapse in 2008. If they go on war with the only country which has substantially helped to keep them afloat that will be good for those of us who never want to see or hear of zanu pf again.

Galore - 26 July 2016

Funny enough that South Africa only need Zimbabweans for business , what about aresting and deporting our fellow ones?????

Khalabemgeza - 26 July 2016

It makes more sense to resuscitate local industries first, when the goods are now being locally produced then import barriers can be introduced. Banning is a sign of the country having no long term economic strategy.

ADF - 26 July 2016

It it incumbent upon politicians from both Zimbabwe and SA to diplomatically handle this situation to ensure that it does not get out of hand because it does not bode well for cordial political and economic relations between the two countries

Bongani - 26 July 2016

give a compative price in zim and see if people will continue going over the boarder to buy these products rather than barning

gift - 26 July 2016

The pricing regime in Zim is very exploitative and this creates speculative tendencies across the entire delivery chain. Check the few examples below:- HD decoder in SA (R399) and in Zim ($45 = R675), JVC 32inch TV in SA (R2500) and in Zim $270 = R4050) Bread in SA (R12) in Zim ($0.90 = R13.50) I L milk in SA (R12) in Zim ($1.40 = R21) Tin beans in SA (R8) in Zim ($0.95 = R14) Cooking oil in SA (R39) in Zim ($3.50 = R52) and so on. We are a nation of crooks and we need to reverse that to succeed.

Sagitarr - 27 July 2016

Spot on @Sagitarr

Samaz - 27 July 2016

iwe khalabemgeza why you do not want to be arrested if you commit crimes, after all not having required documents as a legal immigrant .those with papers can not experience deportation.so you think they should produce and sell for themselves, remember we got trade relations

stz - 27 July 2016

Sagitarr, you are a breath of fresh air. We are protecting inefficiency and the extravagant life styles of local company executives who live in opulence, whilst the workers go unpaid for months.

truth hurts - 27 July 2016

What worries us as Africans more is that nearly all the politicians, starting from the highest office, cabinet ministers, deputy ministers and MP's are business persons who own these chain stores that are being said to be protected by this SI64. The dairy belongs to the first family hence the banning of importing any dairy product. The VP, Mphoko would not be pleased if you stock beans from outside SA because Choppies has enough of these and so on and so on.............

Balanganani Waniwa - 27 July 2016

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.