10 fundamental causes of Zim financial crisis

HARARE - The banking sector plays an intermediary role in the economy through a process called financial mediation.

In laymen’s terms, this simply means mobilising surplus deposits and lending to borrowers. Moreover, these deposits can be short term, medium term, long term, fixed or on-call.

The majority of the $6 billion dollars annual deposits have been in the form of demand deposits, which means that depositors can withdraw them on demand at any time.

In other words, banks must ensure that they maintain healthy balance sheets to avoid a situation where liabilities exceed assets.

The whole banking system is therefore strictly regulated and supervised by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe in order to maintain financial stability and confidence in the banking system.

Beginning January 2016, public and business confidence started to wane due to a plethora of reasons. Peoples’ confidence in the banking system deteriorated fast and things came to a head in May 2016.

The reasons for the collapse of confidence in the banking sector can be unpacked as follows:


The bickering in government over the indigenisation policy and the lack of consistency on this matter triggered panic from investors and depositors.

You may recall that minister Patrick Zhuwao threatened all non-complying firms with forced closure or expropriation.

This included banks. At the same time, minister Patrick Chinamasa preferred a case by case approach to indigenisation which sharply contradicted Zhuwao’s  wholesale approach. In the end, the two ministers issued out an ambiguous indigenisation framework in January 2016.

In April 2016, Zhuwao  was at it again, issuing yet another threat to companies who had not complied.

The net effect was capital flight. Yet it is abundantly clear that the indigenisation policy has damaged economic recovery over a long period. It is the elephant in the living room because it scares investors.

Payment of war veterans transfers

Mugabe had to avert a potentially explosive situation and doled out $6,4 million dollars towards school fees for children of war veterans.

I don’t have any problem with the payment of fees but my point is that government did not have this kind of  money. It dipped its fingers into depositors’ funds.

Tobacco farmers

When the tobacco marketing season commenced, government commandeered all farmers to open bank accounts. The government then pounced on the banked funds to meet its recurrent expenditure which include the staggered payment of bonuses.

The Lima Agreement

Last year in Lima, the capital of Peru, Chinamasa signed an agreement with the IMF, World Bank and AfDB wherein he undertook to pay the $1,8 billion dollar arrears within three months ( February, March, April 2016).

Chinamasa had hoped that the repayment would unlock new funding. Of course, this was a grave mistake. Government had to run like a headless chicken to look for the $1,8 billion dollars.  Government had to borrow from the banking sector and other sources.

Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS)

Government pounced on all RTGS funds at the central bank in order to pay its financial obligations. This had a huge impact on banking sector liquidity.

Public borrowing

Government has been issuing Treasury Bills now amounting to $2 billion dollars. The problem is that all the TBs were rolled over upon maturity. This seriously affected banks’ cash flows. In fact, some banks were driven to the brink of collapse by the purchase of TBs.

Illicit financial outflows

Corruption, lack of transparency and accountability, all roled into one, combined to perforate fiscal revenues. The $15 billion dollar heist from Marange is one typical example.

Poor revenue performance

Zimra revenue collections are dwindling every month because companies are closing. Growth is plummeting and there is a general slump in production. The economy has negative savings.

Zanu PF implosion

The infighting in Zanu PF has not helped the situation. In fact, it has imperilled the functionality of government, leaving the economy to freeze.

The absence of an economic stimulus programme has weakened growth. The boomerang effect is that the overall liquidity situation of the country is impaired.

Worsening trade deficit

The current account balance has worsened due to the depreciation of the rand.

Zimbabwe’s annual import bill is $6 billion dollars compared to exports to the tune of $2,9 billion dollars.

This leaves a trade deficit of $3 billion dollars. The trade deficit and budget deficit are like twin deficits. Twin relationships are always problematic.


Dollarisation requires that the economy be opened to business without any hindrances. The supply of United States dollars are from the following sources:

(1) Official development assistance, which is not forthcoming because of the debt overhang,  and governance and human rights issues that have resulted in sanctions.

(2) Balance of payments support from multi-lateral institutions which is not forthcoming

(3) Lines of  credit which have dried up

(4) Exports, which are depressed because companies are operating below capacity and the proceeds are externalised

(5) Foreign Direct Investment which is not coming because of Indigenisation and policy inconsistency.

At the end of the day, we can see that through its omissions and commissions,  government is culpable for the current cash shortages. MDC rejects any scapegoating or red herrings.

The re-introduction of the Zim dollar means that government now has access to the printing press where it can then create superficial credit in the economy through seigniorage revenue revenues, a process which stokes hyperinflation.

We are back again to the days of vodoo economics and financial engineering — all to the detriment of the economy.

Next, I will offer alternative solutions to the current financial crisis from the point of view of the MDC.

*Mashakada is MDC shadow minister of Finance.

Comments (1)

If nobody minds i would also like to add to your list... Interest charged by the banks is high given that inflation is at it`s lowest in general. Whenever the cost of money(interest) is too high investment is low, general knowledge: people dont borrow. So there is no circulation, not to mention multiplication of money in the economy. The other thing is: if i bank my money today(in those banks no normal person trusts) after some time you would find out that it has disappeared into the vast of the economy: they add little or no value to your money: standard bullshit. Money in the informal sector is much if i may use the layman`s terms, people do not trust the system anymore and i think they are right because banks and financial institutions no longer have the social responsibility or maybe they deny it now. We can go all the way talking about these problems, but i really think the truth of the matter here is a public secret: THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK ANYMORE! Thank you

Student E640 - 11 May 2016

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.