Tomana accused of shielding Kereke

HARARE - Prosecutor-general Johannes Tomana yesterday asked for a postponement in a matter in which he is accused of failing to comply with a court order to issue a certificate for the private prosecution of Zanu PF MP for Bikita West Munyaradzi Kereke on rape allegations.

Kereke is accused of raping a girl, who was 11 at the time.

The girl’s guardian, Francis Maramwidze, through the family lawyer Charles Warara, sought Kereke’s private prosecution, claiming that the police had failed to act on the rape report since October 2009.

Despite High Court judge Happias Zhou’s order for Kereke’s private prosecution, Tomana has not acted upon the directive, prompting Maramwidze to lodge an application yesterday before High Court judge November Mtshiya.

However, Tomana asked for the court to wait until the outcome of his Constitutional Court application, in which he argued that he was the only person with the discretion to issue a certificate for private prosecution.

The matter is set for hearing on October 28.

In his High Court application, Maramwidze said that Tomana did not want to abide by the court’s ruling.

“In view of all this, it is evident that the respondent (Tomana) does not want to comply with this court’s order,” Maramwidze said.

“Respondent is fully wilfully refusing to oblige.

“Reasons advanced for non-compliance are not cogent and in the premises, I seek an order for contempt of court to be made against the respondent in his personal capacity since he has effectively refused to comply with a court order.”

Maramwidze said despite his lawyer writing several letters to Tomana, he has remained adamant, giving “strange reasons” for the delays.

He said that he decided to pursue Kereke’s private prosecution after he was convinced that the parliamentarian had a case to answer.

However, Kereke pleaded his innocence, claiming he had no case to answer and should not be prosecuted on the charges.

Comments (5)

This is disgusting in a constitutional democracy to say the least! The case has been going on for the last 5 years without Kereke being prosecuted in a court of law . If Kereke is innocent why does he get the court clear his name? Why is Tomana shielding Kereke? Is Tomana above the law? Tomana used his discretion not to prosecute Kereke for what ever reason. Having refused to prosecute Kereke Tomana should surely give the father of this minor child a certificate for private prosecution. Why is Tomana and his political mates shielding Kereke from facing justice? Alternatively Concourt should urgently tell the Nation whether or not Tomana is law unto to himself or not.Why is amai Grace Mugabe quiet on this matter? We thought she was fighting for the girlchild's human rights! Animal farm justice.

Agrieved Father - 7 October 2015

How do you expect Tomana to prosecute Kereke, when the same Tomana recently said 13 yead old girls could get married. He is probably eyeing some neighbour's 13 year daughter himself.

machakachaka - 8 October 2015

Ramba nacho chitupa ichocho iwe Tomana kusvika vose vanyarara kuti shi-i ! Usambovapa kusvika vagwadama. Kana vachida ngavanyore chitupa ichocho voga, vosaina voga, vogoenda kucourt voga, Kereke hauyiko, chero iwe mukoma Tomana hauuyiko. Kkkkkkk!!!!

Muponyeri - 8 October 2015

@muponyeri ........ you are disturbed

amz - 13 October 2015

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.
Enter the three characters from the image on the right. This helps prevent automated 'bots' from submitting spam to the site. This field is NOT case-sensitive. If the characters are a bit hard to see, try refreshing the code by clicking the image.