VPs can also be ministers: Experts

HARARE - Legal gurus say there is no constitutional impediment that precludes Zimbabwe’s newly-appointed vice presidents from holding ministerial positions at the same time.

This follows heated and ongoing public debates about whether vice presidents Emmerson Mnangagwa and Phelekezela Mphoko should also simultaneously hold ministerial positions, as they both do, particularly seeing that they cannot be legislators by virtue of being VPs where the law demands that members of Cabinet must be Members of Parliament.

Constitutional expert and interim co-leader of the United MDC, Welshman Ncube, said his understanding and reading of the Constitution was that President Robert Mugabe could appoint a vice president to be in charge of a certain portfolio.

“That doesn’t mean that the vice president is a minister. He is a VP in charge of a particular portfolio. In the case of Mnangagwa, for example, he is a VP with responsibilities of superintending over the Justice ministry, as he also has other responsibilities such as acting as the president when the president is away or supervising some ministers.

“So Mphoko and Mnangagwa are VPs who supervise particular ministries.

“I don’t think that is untoward or not consistent with democratic tradition because historically we have seen prime ministers assigning themselves ministries.

“The world over is abound with such examples and there is nothing amiss with that. Moreso, the Zimbabwean Constitution doesn’t prohibit that,” Ncube told the Daily News yesterday.

Kent law lecturer, Alex Magaisa, concurred with Ncube’s sentiments.

“My reading of the Constitution is that there is no constitutional barrier to this arrangement,” he said.

Magaisa said the provision that most people had raised was section 103 of the Constitution which provided that the president and his vice presidents must not, directly or indirectly, hold any other public office while they are in office — with a ministerial office falling within the definition of a “public office” under section 332, which stated that a public office was “a paid office in the service of the State”.

“On a strict reading of section 103, it would therefore, appear that appointing a VP to a ministerial role would seem to be impermissible.

However, in my opinion, section 103 cannot and should not be read in isolation,” he said.

He added that section 104(1) provided that the president “may reserve to himself or herself the administration of an Act, Ministry or department”, and since the vice presidents assisted the president in carrying out his functions, it could be argued that he could legally assign his lieutenants to administer whatever ministry or ministries that he would have reserved for his office under this provision.

Another lawyer who spoke to the Daily News on condition of anonymity also said the president could assign a certain ministry to his office and appoint one of his deputies to supervise it.

“That vice president doesn’t become a minister but a VP who has been delegated to supervise a ministry. So from a legal point of view what is obtaining is correct although it may not be preferable,” he said.

Comments (7)

I'm not so sure. I thought a VP cannot hold any other job, unless being a minisiter is not a job.

Rejoice Ngwenya - 19 December 2014

Just call them Deputy presidents or special ministers...doesn't change anything. Mugabe said they will be his boys.

Garikayi - 19 December 2014

FOR SALE HP TONER CARTRIDGES 05A, 10A, 11A, 12A, 13A, 15A, 24A, 35A, 36A, 42A, 49A, 51A, 53A, 55A, 61A, 64A, 78A, 80A, 83A, 85A, 90A, 96A, 125A, 131A, 135A, AND MANYMORE 0772 678 311

GALLERY CARTRIDGES - 19 December 2014

FOR SALE HP TONER CARTRIDGES 05A, 10A, 11A, 12A, 13A, 15A, 24A, 35A, 36A, 42A, 49A, 51A, 53A, 55A, 61A, 64A, 78A, 80A, 83A, 85A, 90A, 96A, 125A, 131A, 135A, AND MANYMORE 0772 678 311

GALLERYCARTRIDGES - 19 December 2014

In a country full of intellectuals like ours (even if they were not there) there is no justification for one person to hold 2 posts.Why not give one of them to Chinotimba?

Tahir Iqbal - 19 December 2014

Staying focused is not always easy; we tend to get distracted by the sideshows. Debates that do not speak to our problems have a way of popping up. There is a type of leadership that we should get rid of from among us - a type of leadership where the presiding officers become Masters or even owners of public property instead of the people owning it. That type of leadership must go and that time of follower must change.

Mauchaza - 20 December 2014

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.
Enter the three characters from the image on the right. This helps prevent automated 'bots' from submitting spam to the site. This field is NOT case-sensitive. If the characters are a bit hard to see, try refreshing the code by clicking the image.