Budget lacks ministry allocations: Makoni

HARARE - Former Finance minister Simba Makoni has described the 2015 national budget presented last Thursday as devoid of sound content.

The opposition Mavambo/Kusile/Dawn leader said the ruling government has no clue how to tackle Zimbabwe’s mounting economic problems.

With the budget silent on allocations to government ministries as has been the norm since 1980, Makoni said Finance minister Patrick Chinamasa was forced to make an ad hoc presentation when he was not ready.

“My sense is that the minister was not ready for this budget,” Makoni told a news conference.

“The statement was incoherent, and in some respect, even contradictory. He was rushed to meet a date, and just went through the motion.

“It is noteworthy that the minister did not announce any allocations to line ministers, apart from the $252 million allocated to the Presidential Input Scheme. It must be the first time that a budget has been presented without announcing the allocations to the different ministries.”

Makoni said next year’s budget statement “lacks sound rigorous analysis” and does not explain how the cash-strapped government is going to stimulate economic growth.

With Zanu PF’s attention cycle fixated on the 6th national people’s congress, a critical analysis of the budget would be “considered politically incorrect and unacceptable, especially in the week before the ‘elective congress’, against the background of the blood bath in Zanu PF.”

In his budget statement, Chinamasa estimated a GDP growth of 3,1 percent this year and 3,2 percent next year, but did not explain the source of the growth.

Concurrently, he predicted a slowdown in all sectors, especially agriculture and mining, which were anchors to last year’s 6,1 percent growth which he was forced to revise to 3,1 percent.

“The minister used some attractive sound bites, but gave no content. For example: ..........mining is the anchor for socio-economic transformation; we operate an unsustainable pricing structure; there has been progress in strengthening the financial services sector, and the sector is stable; we have a 15 point debt resolution strategy; our balance sheet is very strong; and we need new capital injection into the economy; etc.”

“But when you analyse the statement, you find no elaboration of those sound bites, and worse, no proposals or measures for realising them,” Makoni said.

The former Sadc executive secretary said while Chinamasa admitted to the closure of companies and rising unemployment, he did not give any proposals “for mitigating the catastrophe”.

With the Indigenisation Act, that forces foreign companies to cede 51 percent of their shares to locals seen as a major stumbling block to attracting much-needed foreign direct investment (FDI), Makoni said Chinamasa’s “lame proposals” did little to bring coherence.

“On indigenisation, the minister’s statement further confused, rather than clarifying the matter,” Makoni said.

“There is need for clear public guidelines and parameters for local and foreign investors to apply.”

He said a budget statement “should present a vision and road map of where the government plans to take the national economy.”

“It should also provide a compass for the rest of society to follow and base their own actions,” he said.

“In our current situation, a few anchor issues should have been posited.

“A government that is basking in the glory of a so-called landslide victory, should have the guts and will to break new ground.”

Comments (6)

Makoni did not read the budget in full. Line Minisries allocations are there for everyone to see

mbatatisi - 1 December 2014

eg Public Service: Vote 3 $19 755 000 Idustry and Commerce: Vote 7 $ 18 673 000 what Line Ministry allocations are you talking about

mbatatisi - 1 December 2014

@mbatatisi what page(s) do you find the allocations. I also looked for those but i did not find maybe i was in some kind of rush, but that was exactly what i was looking for, coz , you know waht i wanted to compare the Allocation to Ministry of Industry against the Allocation to the President's Office. In the previous statement it was 7/8 Million for Ministry of Industry & Commerce against 200 million for the President's Office. Would you like to assist Mr Mbatatisi Sir?

chama - 1 December 2014

Figures may be omitted to permit smooth 'switching' from one ministry to another depending on perceived needs, which defeats the mechanistic meaning of the term "Budget". And, where the figures are clearly contradicting the national needs/urgency in the various areas/sectors; it makes 'sense' not to disclose them, or disclosing them elsewhere for the readers/researcher to go and dig it out. (the philosophy in legal Terms & Conditions of Sale/Agreement...etc). The strategy is that one must make an analysis/argument without the full facts. And, when the facts are later obtained, the analytical argument would have long been forgotten.

Makanaka - 1 December 2014

I have the pull out of the budget from a local daily dated Friday 28 November 2014. The line Ministry allocations on pages C13 to C16 and they are very detailed

mbatatisi - 2 December 2014

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.
 
Enter the three characters from the image on the right. This helps prevent automated 'bots' from submitting spam to the site. This field is NOT case-sensitive. If the characters are a bit hard to see, try refreshing the code by clicking the image.