Mutsvangwa fêted by 'hated' Americans

HARARE - Chris Mutsvangwa, the outspoken deputy minister of Foreign Affairs, who is often quoted by State media when they are denigrating other senior Zanu PF officials accused of colluding with the West in their alleged plots to oust President Robert Mugabe from power, was himself hosted and fêted by the Americans two years ago.

The Daily News was told yesterday that Mutsvangwa was flown to the US capital, Washington, by the Americans in 2012, “to discuss Zimbabwe’s political transition”, although he is now often at the forefront of denigrating party bigwigs like Vice President Joice Mujuru, who are alleged to be working in cahoots with the West to topple Mugabe from power.

Mutsvangwa, who went to Washington with six other Zimbabweans — among them former minister in the government of national unity Jameson Timba — was sponsored in full, to travel there by the National Endowment for Democracy (Ned), a congressionally-funded non-governmental organisation, to discuss “new political dynamics” in Zimbabwe, in meetings that took place between July 10 and 16, 2012.

The Washington meetings were held under the theme, “Re-thinking Zimbabwe,” and sought to help “the international community to reassess opportunities for democratic reform” in the country, and explored ways that the United States Government could help the MDC to push Zanu PF to implement a power-sharing agreement that would lead to Zanu PF losing power”, according to diplomats who took part in the Harare leg of the discussions.

The July 2012 meetings were a sequel to a similar meeting convened in Harare by the United States Government through its Assistant Secretary for African Affairs, Johnnie Carson, that was held on May 23, 2011, between 2pm and 8pm” to reflect on ways of re-aligning US foreign policy on Zimbabwe”.

That meeting was coordinated by Michael Gonzales, Counsellor for Political and Economic Affairs at the US Embassy.

Mutsvangwa confirmed attending the meeting yesterday, but only as a representative of Zanu PF.

“I went there representing Zanu PF and I was representing the Zimbabwe government. I have represented the Zimbabwe government on several occasions. I speak to everybody, it’s laughable,” he said.

Timba told the Daily News yesterday that the meeting was held to map the way forward towards democratic transition and that he, along with Arthur Mutambara, were representing the government as ministers.

“Yes, we went to America and it was a conference on rethinking Zimbabwe.

“The whole essence being re-engagement with Zimbabwe in the process of democratisation. The government paid for my trip, but I don’t know about Mr Mutsvangwa,” he said.

The Harare discussion in 2011, like the Washington one in 2012, involved selected individuals who were assured that their contributions would not be made public, since the discussion was “not-for attribution” and followed Chatham House rules.

That the meetings may have been bent on exploring ways of effecting the so-called regime change in Zimbabwe is exposed by one panellist in one of his submissions during the meetings, where he complains that the use of the term “eventual transfer of power and transition” by the conveners of the discussions “betrayed some partisan attitude” — insisting that the conveners of the discussions “should not prejudge the transition as one inferring the transfer of power from Zanu PF to MDC”.

The May 2011 discussions, which set the tone for the July 2012 meetings in Washington, which Mutsvangwa was part of, centred on “reforming” the security sector, the banning of the sale of Chiadzwa diamonds, postponement of elections and the involvement of external armed forces in Zimbabwe’s elections, as well as suggestions of exploiting economic hardships for mobilising masses against Mugabe in the style of the Arab Spring.

One Michael Bratton, realising what he terms, “their (security elites) ever-present capacity to act as spoilers”, suggested in the Harare discussion, that “the security elite must be involved in and assent to a new political settlement”, adding that face-to-face negotiations with the security elite were inevitable if the security sector reform he spoke about were to be attained.

Others like Peter Godwin suggested, without elaboration, that “young officers, in particular ones who have not played a part in the liberation war, might be enticed by promises of training, improved salaries and conditions, to help support an orderly transition — in an Egypt-like scenario”.

He also, without outlining how it could be implemented, suggested that “the USG (United States Government) should continue to encourage police and army officers to obey only those orders that conform to the rule of law.”

 

Comments (7)

It is very interesting to hear that Christopher attended this meeting in Washington. As a former diplomat he is very much aware that the National Endowment for Democracy is a United States Government agency established by the Reagan Administration to effect regime change agendas in Latin and Central America and in Africa. To say that he was representing Zanu pf and the government at the same time raises a lot of eyebrows. In 2012 he was not a member of government and could therefore not represent the government. Mutambara and Timba were in government and were rightly representing the government. Christopher cannot try to fool us because we are aware of his many meetings with US officials when he was in China, meetings that were not sanctioned by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at that time. There is no one in ZANU PF who is not eager to talk to the Americans. Wkki/leaks said Jonathan is a good messenger of information. Saka Christopher must not throw stones whilst he is leaving in a glass house.

Dunga - 13 November 2014

Sociopath Zanu PF cadres have many tell signs. Some of these include chameleon emulation, saying what they believe the listener wants to hear, gravy-train riding, hallucination, fraudulent education credentials, extortion, free-loading, a total lack of empathy for anyone or anything, kleptomania, violence, self-aggrandizement, delusion, schizophrenia, and brown-nosing. {Score this sociopath deadbeat yourself}

Bathwell Mugariri - 13 November 2014

The following is taken from the report above, "The Harare discussion in 2011, like the Washington one in 2012, involved selected individuals who were assured that their contributions would not be made public, since the discussion was “not-for attribution” and followed Chatham House rules. The Washington meeting was very public and the video is still available online to this day.

Ban'a - 13 November 2014

Now therefor in light of these revelations who is an American puppet, VP Mujuru or Squeler (Ani Farm) Christopher Mutsvangwa ? And by the way did Mutsvangwa complete his tour of duty in China, if not why ?

003Tico - 14 November 2014

Its very easy to discover who is the real sell-out in ZANUPF-its the one who shouts loudest and points fingers at others! It works, all the time.

Johno - 14 November 2014

its clear, Honourable Mutsvangwa was on sanctioned duty fools, this is politics, no moron can understand the matrix.

Hactor - 14 November 2014

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.