Mugabe serious on violence

HARARE - President Robert Mugabe is serious. There will be no violence in this year’s elections.
If there is, he will not be responsible. People might ask why? After all the country has never held any elections that were free of violence since its independence!

The answer is simple. Mugabe is fighting for legitimacy and a noble exit.

The next question then is, why is Mugabe fighting for legitimacy now if every election has been marred by violence since independence?

A look at the country’s history shows that it has been divided into three phases.

The first decade when the country was still suffering from what people termed the independence euphoria and the majority supported Mugabe, blindly.

The second decade when there was relative stability after the merger of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front (Zanu PF) and the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (Zapu) which turned the country virtually into a one-party State.

And the third decade when everything went haywire with the emergency of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) and the fast-track land reform programme.

Though there was violence in the first decade, the West turned a blind eye and showered Mugabe with accolades and hailed him as the best statesman in Africa because of his policy of reconciliation.

If Mugabe had stepped down before the unity accord of 1987 for example, or soon thereafter, he would probably still be considered a better statesman than Nelson Mandela.

Mugabe himself was the victim of violence in 1980.

His lieutenants were subjected to harassment and violence, their houses were bombed, his party headquarters was bombed, his house in Mount Pleasant was under constant attack, he escaped a bomb blast in Masvingo — all this prior to the February 1980 elections.

But Mugabe won those elections overwhelmingly because people wanted peace.

His Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army was considered the guarantors of peace.

The 1985 elections were marred by violence. This time it was Mugabe’s government targeting his previous liberation partner Zapu.

Villages were burnt to the ground in the purge against so-called dissidents. One person was even dragged from a police station and killed. Thousands of villagers were killed in the Midlands and Matebeleland.

At the time Mugabe was so sacrosanct that even the West turned a blind eye and showered him with awards instead.

Maybe this was because it was black-on-black violence and did not affect those who controlled the economy.

The 1990 elections were also violent.

This time the violence was targeted at the newly formed Zimbabwe Unity Movement (Zum) formed by former Zanu PF secretary-general, Edgar Tekere, who had been technically Mugabe’s number two.

Former Gweru mayor Patrick Kombayi was shot and almost killed in the run-up to the elections. He had joined Zum and was contesting against the then Vice President Simon Muzenda.

The 1995 elections were probably the most peaceful because the country was now virtually a one-party State ruled by the new Zanu PF which was a merger of the old Zanu PF and Zapu.

The emergency of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in 1999 brought back violence in the 2000 elections.

Elections since then have been marred by violence and this has been worsened by the West’s overt drive to kick Mugabe out of government.

While most people have focussed on the MDC threat, the real problem was not that MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai would takeover.

It was Mugabe who became a monster because he had upset the “natural order” of things by taking over land from white farmers — the backbone of Zimbabwe’s economy.

British academic George Monbiot put it succinctly: “The seizure of the white farms is both brutal and illegal. But it is merely one small scene in the tragedy now playing all over the world.

“Every year, some tens of millions of peasant farmers are forced to leave their land, with devastating consequences for food security.

“For them there are no tear-stained descriptions of a last visit to the graves of their children. If they are mentioned at all, they are dismissed by most of the press as the necessary casualties of development… These are dark-skinned people being expelled by whites, rather than whites being expelled by black people. They are, as such, assuming their rightful place, as invisible obstacles to the rich world’s projects. Mugabe is a monster because he has usurped the ‘natural order’.”

Everything that Mugabe touched since then has been tainted with blood. Even the country’s diamonds have been termed blood diamonds when the official definition meant something else.

With the economy slowly getting back on track, there has never been a better time for Mugabe to exit.

But he must leave a victor — a legitimate winner. Mugabe must therefore ensure that he wins the elections, freely and squarely this time.

And this must be pronounced so by the West and not just by the friendly countries that have accepted his 2002, 2005, and 2008 victories.

This will not be an easy task because Mugabe has been a cash cow for decades.

People have thrived from his “misrule” and have been shouting that he must go during the day but praying all night that God give him life and a prolonged stay in office.

It will therefore not be in their interests for the country to have peaceful elections whose results will be accepted internationally.

Ironically, a Tsvangirai victory is a road to starvation for these people.

There are already reports of violence being tabulated by these people, yet no one knows yet when the elections will be held. They are preparing the groundwork.
— The Insider

Comments (1)

I believe Mugabe is sincere. There is one thing he wishes to achieve and there are two things he wishes to avoid. He wishes to achieve a legitimate presidency, and have his last presidency a peaceful one in which he will, at last, do some serious nation building. he wishes to avoid the international court in Europe which may want to try him for the murder of 20,000 people in Matabeleland. if he can have one last legitimate presidency, maybe he can negotiate a resignation of the presidency for a 'no trial'. But the second thing he wants to avoid is the burning fires of hell that await him. The flames of hell are licking higher and higher, waiting for his death. All the people who he bribed and manipulated into murder, rape, forced starvation, beatings, theft, intimidation, lying, cheating, deceiving, destroying are screaming in pain and torment, crazy with desire to welcome him into hell, so they can curse him for his leadership, leading them to burn forever. They do not blame themselves for their torment. They blame him for offering them riches, revenge, and lust for murder and rape and small houses; power, glory in return for following him with the same devotion Christians give to Jesus Christ. Alas, 80 years of lust and glory and power cannot compensate for 100 billion years of hellfire, guilt, torment, pain and suffering in hell. Honorable president, we love you and respect you because you are our liberator who liberated us from Rhodesia,and who has liberated the land for us and the businesses and the mines. You are our leader. because we love you we are crying for your soul. We are weeping in prayer so that you can repent and believe that Jesus Christ came on earth to save sinners, of whom I am one and you are one. God came down to earth so that man can reveal the greatness of the grace and love of God. The more people you have murdered, the more glorious the revelation of the love of God. Our president, we want to live with you forever in peace and joy and the love of God in heaven. Confess your sins and believe in the mercy of God. You were merciless but Jesus is merciful. Now you can receive his mercy and show his mercy before you die.

wordwriter - 30 January 2013

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.