Is Zim heading to pre-2009?

HARARE - A front page newspaper photograph with the headline: “Hundreds queue outside banks for hours to make withdrawals,” sent chills down our spines.

Whether we liked it or not it was impossible to stop the automatic flashback to five years ago.

The independent media reported that banks couldn’t meet the withdrawal requirements of depositors.

As a result limits were put on the amounts of withdrawals customers could make, ranging from $200 to $1 000 dollars a day.

Suddenly, the new phrase at every turn was “liquidity crunch” which in plain English simply means shortage of money.

A senior staff member at one bank, choosing anonymity for himself and his bank, told the press that the huge queues were only the result of ATM machines being down.

“We don’t want you to write a negative story on this one because it will have a boomerang effect, “he said.

A negative story creating a boomerang effect? How insulting it is for banks to be saying this to Zimbabweans who have all lost their money repeatedly in the past decade after a series of financial crises which most of us have yet to recover from.

Repeated devaluations including the notorious “Zero to Hero” debacle turned us all into paupers.
Pensions, insurance policies and savings were lost overnight.

We arrived at banks to find our balances reduced to zero.

Even worse were the times we arrived at banks, building societies and asset management houses to find the doors locked, staff gone and our life savings non-existent.

At no time during the worst of Zimbabwe’s economic crisis did the banks protect us, their customers.

They took our deposits and pay cheques with one hand and gave nothing back in return.

They limited the amount of our own money we could withdraw so we couldn’t pay school fees, buy life-sustaining medication, get enough food despite queuing for hours at our banks.

They stopped paying us interest.

They increased the minimum balance we had to leave in our accounts. They stopped sending us monthly bank statements.

They raised ledger fees repeatedly and introduced new charges for depositing or withdrawing cash and even counting our cash.

They even charged us when we went to the counter to enquire about the balance in our accounts.

Since the dollarisation of the economy in 2009, Zimbabwe has not become a nation of savers again — as we were prior to 2000.

No one trusts the banks with their money anymore and the continual 51 percent indigenisation threats make us even more scared of leaving our money in the banks.

Despite now trading in an international currency, the banks continue to give us minimal, if any, interest.

Putting the customer first is a mentality that still hasn’t seen the light of day in Zimbabwe.

Why is it that banks, like so many of the places where we do business, still don’t appreciate that without us, their customers, they wouldn’t have jobs, or banks?

It doesn’t take a picture or story in the paper to create the ‘boomerang effect’ banks are so scared of.

There are 10 million cell phones sending countless text messages every second, not to mention the queues we are ourselves standing in or seeing with our own eyes.

And as for the “expert” on ZBC TV on Wednesday night blaming the “liquidity crunch” on sanctions: oh please, get real!

It is time for all of us to respond to this sanctions blame game every time it is used by pointing out the fact that only 10 individuals and one company (the ZDI) remain on the EU restricted measures/ targeted sanctions list.

Comments (5)

Whether anyone likes him or hate him, Morgen made everyone's life better so yu zanis keep on insulting him till you wake up one day and find you have NOTHING not even that zimbabwe you think yu like. The suffering hasnt started yet.

kaukonde - 4 December 2013

Cathy it`s not the fault of the banks.There is not much they can do in the face of bad policy and mismanagement.Zimbabwe may have switched to international currencies but since these are not domestic currency,supply will always be a problem because the central bank is not serving it`s purpose.The liquidity problems did not appear in the last few years because the Finance Minister at the time regularly negotiated for the supply of hard currency.Common sense prevailed briefly,to a certain extent.

Torai hobho - 4 December 2013

don hate the player,hate the game. why is ur article focusing on banks and not bad governance

pazvokwadi - 6 December 2013

The only thing Zanu is capable of is making false promises. If they delivered on their promises at the same rate at which they make them, then Zimbabwe would be ahead of all the African nations when it comes to development. but then promises, promises, promises. SHAME ZANU SHAME, SHAME MUGABE SHAME, SHAME ZANU GVT SHAME, SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME...........

mosquito - 7 December 2013

a

T - 7 December 2013

Post a comment

Readers are kindly requested to refrain from using abusive, vulgar, racist, tribalistic, sexist, discriminatory and hurtful language when posting their comments on the Daily News website.
Those who transgress this civilised etiquette will be barred from contributing to our online discussions.
- Editor

Your email address will not be shared.
 
Enter the three characters from the image on the right. This helps prevent automated 'bots' from submitting spam to the site. This field is NOT case-sensitive. If the characters are a bit hard to see, try refreshing the code by clicking the image.